"Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
As you might recall, I was VEHEMENTLY against Mitt the first time. But ONCE AGAIN running a LOSER? Aghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!
As if that wasn't enough to make a girl's head explode (how many time's can one's head explode in a life time?), I read THIS ARTICLE today:
"Author Jacob Heilbrunn speculated in a New York Times op-ed Sunday that neoconservatives may rally around Hillary Clinton if she runs for president in 2016 and Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is her opponent.
Sen. John McCain, a textbook hawk, has more than hinted that he might prefer Hillary Clinton over Rand Paul. When asked in 2013 who he’d support if it came down to Clinton-Paul, McCain answered, laughing: “It’s gonna be a tough choice.”
[T]he thing is, these neocons have a point. Mrs. Clinton voted for the Iraq war; supported sending arms to Syrian rebels; likened Russia’s president, Vladimir V. Putin, to Adolf Hitler; wholeheartedly backs Israel; and stresses the importance of promoting democracy. It’s easy to imagine Mrs. Clinton’s making room for the neocons in her administration.
You might think liberals would worry that Clinton is increasingly respected by these characteristically hawkish Republicans, but it doesn’t. Most liberals stand firmly behind her. (source)
Are you at as much of a loss as I am? Mitt? Jeb? Hillary? Over limited government Paul? He is a Republican. He isn't anti-war like his father...he's tempered.
What am I missing here?