...the conservative that liberals hate to love...
Make sure to read the questions and answers about this item on the ebay page! :)
Leave it to nutters to get a laugh at the expense of 20 dead children.
We are laughing at you shithead.
Leave it to rbb to dance on the graves of 20 dead children.
Poor ribbet, misses the entire point yet again.
Hey tranny boy, go back to ingesting sperm, its the only thing people say you are good at.
ALa: This is a real thigh slapper!rbb: (sigh)Are you actually an old woman?
No one's laughing, dickface, except the Obama administration who wants to use the deaths of these poor babies to give the government yet more control over its subjects.
And no, he isn't an old lady. He's a male/tranny prostitute who thinks he can get himself a sugar daddy if he uses words like 'nutters'.
Pretty hard to use an AR to massacre children -- pretty sure the death toll would have been 1, 2 tops, if this was the weapon he'd carried.
http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/337678/liberalism-versus-blacks-thomas-sowell#Awesome article from Thomas Sowell. My favorite line: "liberals take positions that make them look good and feel good — and show very little interest in the actual consequences for others, even when liberal policies are leaving havoc in their wake."And he applies that logic to gun control as well.
1 or two tops nate? I'm pretty sure the Collumbine kids did pretty well with a shotgun and some pistols and Charles Whitman killed 11 and injured 32 with a hunting rifle. I hate it when people that know nothing about guns think they can make "common sense" rules about something they know nothing about.
Poor Nutterbob! Whenever you want to know what a liberal is doing, just look at what he accuses you of!
"Common sense." I have learned to be suspicious of that phrase. It pretty much always means "We will use the force of the state to reduce your liberty so you conform to our vision of how you must live your life."
"Common sense" is liberal code for DRACONIAN AND AUTHORITARIAN.
It was common sense when the German Jews turned in their guns in 1938.
Or when the Italians turned theirs in, the Russians theirs, the Chinese theirs?
Free, Sounds like justification for outlawing guns, not expanding gun use. Maybe we should hold all gun owners responsible for the acts that are committed with their guns, regardless of circumstances. Or maybe gun companies. I'd expect that would result in guns that can only be fired by their owners.
Nit, you sound like justification for the forced sterilization of idiots. Maybe we should hold all parents responsible for the acts committed by their children, reguardless of circumstances. Or maybe grand parents. I'd expect that would result in people being ultra carefull not to breed more idiots.
Yes, because the outlaw of Marijuana has succeeded so wonderfully. Tell me again why murderous drug cartels exist?I got it, let's hold the makers of paper responsible for drug abuse. We know what "paper" is used for rolling stuff...I mean c'mon.
Post a Comment